Thanks. Have your tests extended to the reading of Vdd? I find the available documentation a bit sparse on that. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:54:31PM +0800, Justin Richards wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > I get similar results to the results I published while running a continuo= us > successful ping in Station Mode. >=20 > I also get similar results when I issue wifi.sta.disconnect() and it is > clear as the pings are not returned. I can not determine that after the > disconnect is issued that the radio is turned off. My existing setup doe= s > not enable me to read precise enough current values, but the needle on th= e > meter does not appear to shift. It gives a slight flutter when I issue t= he > connect command. I will modify the setup shortly to better read currents= .. >=20 > The tests I initially ran were in connected mode but I was not actively > pinging the device at the time. >=20 > Justin >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 20 October 2015 at 16:15, James Cameron wrote: >=20 > > What I've understood is that the ADC channel for reading Vdd can't be > > used when in station mode connected to an access point. So you either > > read it before you connect, or you disconnect, by either calling the > > disconnect function or changing mode to softap. > > > > I've actually not seen any evidence that the external ADC channel is > > also affected. People might be conflating the two. I'm interested in > > your test results once you get to that. > > > > Might be worth monitoring current to the ESP8266 to figure out for > > sure if the radio is off. > > > > Also use other means to verify disconnect, such as a ping from a host > > on the network you joined. > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:02:31PM +0800, Justin Richards wrote: > > > I am struggling to find the required commands to turn the wifi modem = off > > on > > > the ESP8266 to re-run the ADC experiment. > > > > > > There is sleep.type(MODEM.SLEEP) which does not appear to do anything= and > > > modem disconnect from AP command but I can not be sure that is actual= ly > > > turning off the WIFI module. > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > On 20 October 2015 at 12:51, Justin Richards > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I see that I committed a heinous crime that I am always accusing ot= hers > > > > of: providing a meaningless graph without labelling the axis. Let= s > > try > > > > again. > > > > > > > > > > > > The test will be re-run with radio off if the opportunity presents > > itself. > > > > > > > > Attached graph that plots Percentage Error against millivolt range = 0 > > -1020 > > > > with WIFI connected. > > > > > > > > I welcome any feedback regarding graphing to efficiently convey > > > > information. > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > View/change your membership options at > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > --=20 > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .