Tamas, You are probably correct. But a lot of those chemicals are=20 extremely toxic and they can cause death in a matter of seconds even in=20 extremely small quantities. That is probably what the TSA agent was=20 considering. I don't think that even a suicide bomber would want to risk=20 death before he/she/it could complete their mission. Thanks, rich! On 9/29/2015 12:57 AM, Tamas Rudnai wrote: > Thanks Richard, noted. > > Btw: I have realized these tests are rather psychological than real ones. > What I meant is if there is a suicide bomber, most probably they would no= t > mind drinking a little bit of poison before they terminate their own life > anyways. In my logic it just would not add any further security and if TS= A > has any doubts they should just do the necessary chemical tests or sniffi= ng > dogs etc. > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Richard R. Pope > wrote: > >> Tamas, >> If you read all of Bob's message it isn't completely closed. It is >> still open to non-political solutions like whatIi posted. Whinging and >> crying and political stuff will no longer be tolerated. >> Thanks, >> rich! >> >> On 9/29/2015 12:19 AM, Tamas Rudnai wrote: >>> Opps, sorry, did not realize it was closed. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Richard R. Pope >> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Bob, >>>> My pleasure. I thought that what I proposed would be considered= a >>>> solution. While I'm here I would also like to point out that all >>>> messages should have an address line like I did with this one when I >>>> addressed Bob. The messages have to be signed like I will do at the en= d >>>> of this message. I'll let Bob tell you what can happen if you don't do >>>> this. >>>> Thanks, >>>> rich! >>>> P.S Bob sllllooooowwwwww down! >>>> rich! >>>> >>>> --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .