Russell, If I recall correctly, I needed something like 1A current ability and 24V rating - not serious power but also not typical SOT-23 size, either. I actually used a pre-packaged Darlington, not the scheme I was advocating with the separate collectors, because in my case I didn't care about Vsat. I'm guessing that the true Darlington has higher switching speed due to it keeping the higher-current BJT out of saturation? Interestingly, heterojunction bipolar transistor microwave amplifiers often use a Darlington configuration, like this one: http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/ERA-5+.pdf Of course, they are not switching and are not in saturation. I think it is used strictly for increased high-frequency gain. Is a "trilington" a buffered Darlington (three transistors cascaded)? I had a humorous situation once where I decided to see what would happen if I cascaded as many BJTs as possible and use it to indicate very tiny current flow, like a 9V battery from one hand to another. Not surprisingly, eventually the leakage current would bias it partially on - I think at about 5 transistors in my case. I had an LED in the collector and noticed that it was varying in brightness in a somewhat random pattern. I replaced the LED with a speaker and heard the "Pink Panther" theme song :) I was receiving a nearby AM radio station because of rectification in the partially-on transistors. Sean On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:06 PM, RussellMc wrote: > On 6 June 2015 at 14:18, Sean Breheny wrote: > > >> I had a project recently where I designed-in darlingtons because there >> are very few power mosfets which are truly specified to work below 2V >> gate drive, across temperature and manufacturing variation. >> > > Sean - > > Read "as I know you know" in front of any (correct :-) ) assertions that > follow. > > What constitutes "power" in that context - voltage, current, device > dissipation , ... ? > Increasing Vds ratings usually lead to increasing Vth, all else being > equal, so your experience may depend on required voltage rating. > > Aside: > Where you say you 'designed in Darlingtons' I assume that you mean the > arrangement that you described above (deleted) where the driver collector > is returned to supply rather than to load. > This is not strictly a Darlinton pair, but is commonly so called and is o= f > course a very useful arrangement. > This greatly improves on (saturation) voltage at the expense of turn off > times. (I'm always sad that the olde MC34063 uses a true > Darlington. This was to allow then to get the """high""" switching speed > of 100 kH using the technology of the day, but results in very poor outpu= t > stage Vsat. > > [I have some high power "trilingtons' here ex an old high power UPS. > Saturation voltages are horrendous but not too important due to voltage > ratings] > > > > Russell > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .