It was found to be a faulty cable, after it was replaced the results were w=
hat was expected.


>=20
> I think the CERN faster-than-light neutrinos turned out to be a simple (b=
ut
> very difficult to locate) case of measurement error in determining the de=
lay
> in a fiber optic cable run which was used to time the neutrino transit.
>=20
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_anomaly
>=20
>=20
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:13 PM, John Ferrell <jferrell13@triad.rr.com>
> wrote:
>=20
> > I thought that condition was determined to be induced because of
> > photons being momentarily captured by particles with mass.
> >
> > On 5/2/2015 5:42 PM, Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote:
> > > Anybody remember the faster-than-light neutrinos at CERN?
> >
> > --
> > John Ferrell W8CCW
> >     Julian NC 27283
> >   It is better to walk alone,
> > than with a crowd going the wrong direction.
> >                    --Diane Grant
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > View/change your membership options at
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.