On 4 April 2015 at 10:53, Harold Hallikainen wrote= : > > > Realise I had not taken any photos :-(. > > So, you aren't wearing Google Glass? > I would destroy a "Google Glass" in hours to days. Really. Alas. And I have not convinced myself that the cost benefit justifies one compared to other alternative uses of disposable income. But the survival factor alone would be a very major issue. A Sony 7S and essential accoutrements (at several times the cost of Google Glass would be higher up the list. Not totally shabby photos at 65535* ISO! I got to try one briefly for the first time a few weeks ago. Given the bad press people like eg google seem to have given them I was very favourably impressed. Russell * 65535 is what it said in the EXIF. Where they lost the 1 I know not. --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .