On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 03:42:43PM +1300, IVP wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> Well, the little dickens kept me waiting for 54 hours this time, but
> fail it did
>=20
> This time I was set up to catch it fail, repeatedly
>=20
> Here are a couple of screen shots
>=20
> http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/joecolquitt/sdhc.html

That's very clear.  In the failure case, why didn't "do" go low during
"cs" high?  Are you properly detecting and handling that possibility?

--=20
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.