....compiler bug, someone @ microchip did some workarounds that are not=20
viable for my project and require buying the $1000 PRO version.  And did=20
not directly address the fact that these errors shouldn't occur and no=20
information about when XC8 would be fixed.

At least it was a timely not-useful response from Microchip.

J


Jesse Lackey wrote:
> Hi All, I'm working around a weird problem, I'm using XC8 V1.34 and a
> PIC16F1789.
>
> At the moment this problem (which has come up several times) is in my
> bootloader, in its own PSECT.  I have the memory range 0x3800 to 0x3FF0
> reserved for it.
>
> The code I have uses almost the whole thing, so I want to reserve a
> larger range: 0x3400 to 0x3FF0.  In doing, I get many "fixup overflow"
> errors.  Some googling yields not much, basically "it is a bug" and "try
> this", which doesn't work.  It has something to do with RAM and program
> memory banks, which I don't know much about because that's XC8's problem
> to deal with.
>
> I'm not even close to using available RAM/program memory in this chip.
>
> The lines of code with this problem are a simple access in an array of
> bytes.
>
> Wow, so tired of XC8 bugs/deficiencies.
>
> Tx for ANY advice.
> J
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.