Thanks

Much appreciated,



On 24 March 2015 at 01:52, Dwayne Reid <dwayner@planet.eon.net> wrote:

> That's how I read it.  And, yes: your formula is correct.
>
> dwayne
>
> At 03:01 PM 3/23/2015, Chris Roper wrote:
> >I am very rusty in my analogue theory and came across this expression in=
 a
> >National Semi AppNote:
> >
> >R3 =3D R1 || R2
> >
> >Am I correct in thinking that it is saying that R3 is equivalent to R1 a=
nd
> >R2 in parallel.
> >i.e.
> >
> >1/R3 =3D 1/R1 + 1/R2
> >
> >Thanks
> >Chris
>
>
> --
> Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
> Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
> (780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax
> www.trinity-electronics.com
> Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.