Josh Koffman <joshybear <at> gmail.com> writes:

>=20
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Sergey A Dryga <sergey <at> dryga.us> w=
rote:
> > Josh Koffman <joshybear <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> would:
> >>
> >> TARGETbits.PWMLSB =3D arrayofvalues[index];
> >>
> >> work, or would I still need to shift to align the array value with the
> >> bits I'm actually loading? My guess is that I shouldn't have to shift,
> >> but I am unsure.
> >>
> >
> > That should work. This is how Registers are defined in XC* anyway. Look=
 in
> > the device header file for your device for examples.
>=20
> Hi Sergey,
>=20
> I think I asked the question poorly. I know that creating a bitfield
> such that TARGETbits.PWMLSB will be valid is possible from exactly the
> source you recommend - I spent a bunch of time in the processor .h
> file. What I don't know is if writing to it will require a shift.
> Based on some examples I've seen the answer is no. I will need to give
> it a try and find out I think!
>=20
> Josh

Josh,=20

I used the bitfields as you describe, no need to shift.  The bitfield
"looks" like a normal variable, just make sure what you write in is inside
of the range of the variable.  For a bit field, valid values are between 0
and 2^n -1, wwhere n is number of bits. =20
Hope this helps,=20

Sergey




--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.