On 19 December 2014 at 06:39, Robert Dvoracek <lgtngstk@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I believe this would fall under the category of standing waves, which are
> affected by all kinds of things, up to and including the way the operator
> holds its mouth during the "sound off".  A single well placed self-tappin=
g
> screw is nearly as fast and allows later disassembly.  Unless of course y=
ou
> really need a hermetic seal for waterproofing, etc.  In that case, a
> weighted object near the sensitive component(s) to dampen the vibrations
> may help.  As others have mentioned, post assembly testing would be key
> here.
>
>
And you MUST be aware of where Lorenz's butterfly* is at the time, not to
mention Mr Schroedinger's furry feline friend.

FWIW "waterproofness" does not exist, but welding helps heaps.


                  Russell

* At the critical value, both equilibrium points lose stability through a H=
opf
bifurcation <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopf_bifurcation>.[12]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system#cite_note-12> When [image: \rho
=3D 28], [image: \sigma =3D 10], and [image: \beta =3D 8/3], the Lorenz sys=
tem
has chaotic solutions (but not all solutions are chaotic). The set of
chaotic solutions make up the Lorenz attractor, a strange attractor
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractor#Strange_attractor> and a fractal
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal>
with a Hausdorff dimension
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausdorff_dimension> which is estimated to be
2.06 =B1 0.01 and the correlation dimension
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_dimension> estimated to be 2.05 =
=B1
0.01. The Lorenz attractor is difficult to analyze, but the action of the
differential equation on the attractor is described by a fairly simple
geometric model. Proving that this is indeed the case is the fourteenth
problem on the list of Smale's problems
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smale%27s_problems>. This problem was the
first one to be resolved, by Warwick Tucker in 2002. This is almost
certainly of minimal if any relevance to the problem at hand, but, most
other things considered will be too. Finding what's not is the sort of
thing that engineering is all about. And there you were thinking that this
was a wholly irrelevant add on! Thank you for reading me.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system



>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.