John Ferrell <jferrell13 <at> triad.rr.com> writes:

>=20
> Based strictly on this paragraph you sound like a real candidate to me.
> I see a broad base in education, experience in current software=20
> languages. Perhaps self taught for much of that software technology=20
> would be a plus. You would likely be quick to learn new things and not=20
> be locked in to what you already know. People who show the initiative to=
=20
> learn on their own don't rely on the past to find the future.
> I would not recommend this direction if you really don't care for a high=
=20
> intensity job.
> But don't underestimate your yourself.

Thanks for good words.  I try to stay in the realm of biotechnology (loosel=
y
defined), but I do tend to change a more narrow specialization every 5-7
years. =20

As for the high intensity -- this is not a problem.  I like working in
start-up environment and it is always hectic there :-)

Part of the reasons I like electronics is that I relax doing it, the
problems at my "day" job are usually more complex, so a more deterministic
discipline like engineering is relaxing.  At least to the extent that I am
not developing terribly complex engineering systems.=20

>=20
> OTH, nobody cares what I think!

We (PICList) do!

Thanks,=20

Sergey Dryga, KF5VYY




--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.