Based strictly on this paragraph you sound like a real candidate to me.
I see a broad base in education, experience in current software=20
languages. Perhaps self taught for much of that software technology=20
would be a plus. You would likely be quick to learn new things and not=20
be locked in to what you already know. People who show the initiative to=20
learn on their own don't rely on the past to find the future.
I would not recommend this direction if you really don't care for a high=20
intensity job.
But don't underestimate your yourself.

OTH, nobody cares what I think!

On 11/30/2014 3:13 AM, Sergey A Dryga wrote:
> Funny what recruiters do, isn't it?  I was recently approached by one for=
 a
> position of CTO in a software company,- because I had MySQL, C++ and C in=
 my
> resume.  No listed experience in a software technology, education and
> professional experience  is only in life sciences, but they thought I am
> well qualified to run development in software company! They either did no=
t
> read the resume, or did not understand it.

--=20
John Ferrell W8CCW
    Julian NC 27283
  It is better to walk alone,
than with a crowd going the wrong direction.
                   --Diane Grant


--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.