On 12 November 2014 14:24, James Cameron wrote: > Interesting things may happen if the identifier is wrong; 'cause we > support NiMH as well as LiFePO4. > > That I knew, but: > We're adding LiPoly now. I've been busily testing samples. > > http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/rsmith/ec-cl4_ras/log/?h=3Dlipoly > > is of interest. Why add LiPoly? Do you expect to achieve the same cycle life? (published as 2000 cycles in your specs) Is whole of life cost per energy stored superior? Any problems with the LiFePO4 that contribute to this? You were using BYD for LiFePO4. Still? Any specific LiPoly manufacturer? Other? Russell --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .