Yeah, the more I think about it, the less I like it. There's no real reason to do it- my escape routes are clear enough, now that I've moved further into the design. Thanks for the input everyone! MikeH On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, James Holland wrote: > > > > > From: piclist-request@mit.edu > > Subject: Piclist Digest, Vol 123, Issue 22 > > To: piclist@mit.edu > > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:34:50 -0400 > > > > Send Piclist mailing list submissions to > > piclist@mit.edu > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > piclist-request@mit.edu > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > piclist-owner@mit.edu > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Piclist digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. [EE] NC pin cleverness (Mike Hord) > > 2. Re: [EE] NC pin cleverness (Denny Esterline) > > 3. Re: [EE] NC pin cleverness (Jean-Paul Louis) > > 4. Re: [EE] NC pin cleverness (David VanHorn) > > 5. Re: [EE] NC pin cleverness (Dwayne Reid) > > 6. [OT]:: Engineers explained - Toxoplasma gondii (Brooke Clarke) > > 7. RE: [EE] cheapest microcontroller with 10Kbps RF transciever > > or transmitter ? (Javier Gonzalez Marcos) > > 8. Re: [EE] NC pin cleverness (Harold Hallikainen) > > 9. Re: [EE] cheapest microcontroller with 10Kbps RF transciever > > or transmitter ? (V S) > > 10. Re: [PIC] creating independent versions of a project in > > MPLAB-X ? (Matt Rhys-Roberts) > > 11. Re: [PIC] creating independent versions of a project in > > MPLAB-X ? (Patrick Moody) > > 12. RE: [EE] NC pin cleverness (Joe McCauley) > > 13. Re: [EE] cheapest microcontroller with 10Kbps RF transciever > > or transmitter ? (Jean-Paul Louis) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > From: Mike Hord > > > > Give a package with NC pins does it make sense/is it anything other tha= n > > completely foolish to remove pads and allow mask beneath the NC pins to > > create a route for signals to escape from under the IC? > > > > The IC in question is a 14mm 100-pin TQFP. There are two sections of > > interest: one with six NC pins clustered together and one with two. > > > > These are *true* NC pins- the datasheet specifies them as such. Neither > > group is at a corner; the group of two is nearly dead center and the > group > > of six has six more pins between it and the nearest corner. > > > > There's no exposed pad on this package. > > > > My gut tells me this is okay; this is just a general purpose developmen= t > > board, not something being designed for a high-stress environment. Ther= e > > are three things I worry about: > > 1. Asymmetrical force during reflow: with more pads on one side reflowi= ng > > than the other, will that pull the part off the footprint? > > 2. Strength after deployment: will this put more stress on the other pi= ns > > making them more likely to lift? > > 3. Mask failure: will the pins rub away at the mask, possibly shorting > the > > trace underneath to the pin? The datasheet is mum on the pin, so it may > be > > used for test during manufacture, or it may just be a dead-end inside t= he > > package. I prefer to treat it as an unknown and *not* tie signals to it > on > > the blithe assumption that doing so will have no consequences. > > > > Are there any other things I should worry about? Any compelling reason > not > > to do this? > > > > Mike H > > You need to be quite certain that NC means 'not connected' and not 'no > connect', your FAE should be able to tell you that. Personally I wouldn't > do it, although I've known it done but in those cases the pin was a 'not > connected' and was soldered to the trace. > James > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .