I don't have a clue how they sell so cheap but the ones I've bought=20 (including some that I suspect were mispriced at =A32 each delivered from=20 China for the full module) have all worked perfectly. They may be out of spec chips as has been previously mentioned but for your= =20 frequency range they should be fine. I always treat any items bought from the cheaper Chinese "outlets" as=20 disposable toys rather than a long term investment but occasionally you get= =20 stuff that is properly designed and works well. Dom -----Original Message-----=20 From: Neil Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:08 PM To: piclist@mit.edu Subject: Re: [EE] Digitally-controlled oscillator Argh! Looks awesome, but how do they manage to make these and ship at these low prices, when the Digikey 1K+ pricing is at $16 for the chip alone? Unless these are knock-off chips, I can't understand it. Cheers, -Neil. On 9/16/2014 4:44 PM, Dom S wrote: > Neil - have a look at the Chinese AD9850 boards on eBay - around a fiver > delivered and range from 0.something to lots with plenty of resolution an= d > accuracy. > > Sine wave output with a comparator onboard for square wave. Not a perfect > design but adequate for the majority of messing about. Can be accesses by > serial or parallel loading depending on how quickly you want to change th= e > frequency. > > Bang in the right number for the frequency you're after and you're there. > I've been quite impressed with the unit I've been playing with. > > Dom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:45 PM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: [EE] Digitally-controlled oscillator > > Hi all, > > I need to build a small test device that can generate, among other > things, pulses of specific frequencies. And I'd like to control this > digitally (from a central PIC). Specs would be basic 0-5V pulses, freq > from about 1Hz to 500Hz (higher is fine as I can divide with some > gates), and resolution of about 1Hz across the full range. 1% accuracy > should be fine. And I need to be able to change frequencies very > quickly (say at least 20 times a second). > > Any recommendations on chips that can do this easily? Yes I can use a > PIC for this, but I just need a few of these and would rather just get > something off the shelf. > > So far I've found the DS1077, but at a quick glance, I have to give it a > divisor rather than a frequency and in the low range of divisors it > seems I may not get good resolution. IE: changing divisor from 2 to 3 > would mean a 50% change in frequency. > > Cheers, > -Neil. > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist=20 --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .