On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:09:03AM +1200, RussellMc wrote:
> I think that this statement
>=20
> *Is <SOME PROGRAM> Open Source simply because it's written in <SOME OPEN
> SOURCE LICENSED LANGUAGE>?* No. While languages like PHP
> <http://opensource.org/licenses/PHP-3.0>, Perl
> <http://opensource.org/licenses/Artistic-Perl-1.0> or Python
> <http://opensource.org/licenses/Python-2.0> have implementations that are
> licensed under Open Source licenses, that doesn't turn all code written i=
n
> these languages or run under such implementations into Open Source. The
> code written in such languages or run under such implementations would ne=
ed
> to be licensed under an approved Open Source license in order to be Open
> Source.
> *From here:  http://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero
> <http://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero> *
> Is essentially incorrect for practical purposes.
> No?

It is absolutely correct. As I stated in my other post YOURCODE is YOUR
CODE. Just because it's written in Python, PHP, or other OSS language
doesn't make YOUR CODE open source.

BAJ

>=20
>             R
> --=20
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
Byron A. Jeff
Chair: Department of Computer Science and Information Technology
College of Information and Mathematical Sciences
Clayton State University
http://faculty.clayton.edu/bjeff
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.