Gordon;

I think you first need to understand what a crystal is. It's NOT a
mechanical device, it manifests 'some' of its properties mechanically only.
It's dominating features are in optical spectrum if you want to talk about
non-linear effects.  Gravity and acceleration are two 'completely'
different phenomena. An accelerating object can change the mass
distribution in spacetime and that can cause gravitational fluctuations
this is almost like PHY101.

Molecular structure of a crystal is obviously far more complex than you can
imagine. 'Mechanical' is macroscopical which IS originating from the
microscopical states and trust me lots of 'funky' stuff are going on at
that scale that can not be solved by classical physics. So indeed we are
talking about a sophisticated mechanism here ; nothing 'mechanical'.

I don't need to watch a 'garage' video completely to comment on a
fundamental physics law.

David;

If you eat enough fast food you can sense them as well.



On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Gordon Williams <gwilliams@ncf.ca> wrote:

> You could do us all a favour by first watching the video completely
> before commenting on it.  Then do a search on the 2g Tipover Test that
> Dave refers to in the video that you didn't watch.
>
> You need to understand that the crystal is a mechanical device more than
> an electrical device and you get very subtle non-linear effects due to
> loading of the crystal due to it's own weight.
>
> Gordon Williams
>
>
>
> On 14-08-05 12:53 PM, Yigit Turgut wrote:
> > You are right I didn't watch the whole video but I am pretty confident
> that
> > I 'understand' the underlying phenomena at the most fundamental level. =
So
> > the change we see on the display is the 'gravity field' change
> originating
> > from what exactly ? I can throw a bunch of 'scientific' papers on the
> table
> > to prove my claim if anyone feels like going deeper down the rabbit hol=
e.
> > If there are more objections and people 'confident' in themselves we wi=
ll
> > do so...
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Allen Mulvey <allen@amulvey.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If you actually watched it before commenting, you would know that he
> did,
> >> in
> >> fact, use a Rubidium counter.
> >>
> >> Allen
> >>
> >>> configurations and not measuring "gravity" at all. I think that mr
> >> eevblog
> >>> should have mentioned the need to use at least a Rubidium clock as
> >> counter
> >>> reference when doing what he did. He must have started some new
> movement
> >>> among the masses with that blog (which I did not watch). All clocks a=
nd
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> >> View/change your membership options at
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.