You could do us all a favour by first watching the video completely=20 before commenting on it. Then do a search on the 2g Tipover Test that=20 Dave refers to in the video that you didn't watch. You need to understand that the crystal is a mechanical device more than=20 an electrical device and you get very subtle non-linear effects due to=20 loading of the crystal due to it's own weight. Gordon Williams On 14-08-05 12:53 PM, Yigit Turgut wrote: > You are right I didn't watch the whole video but I am pretty confident th= at > I 'understand' the underlying phenomena at the most fundamental level. So > the change we see on the display is the 'gravity field' change originatin= g > from what exactly ? I can throw a bunch of 'scientific' papers on the tab= le > to prove my claim if anyone feels like going deeper down the rabbit hole. > If there are more objections and people 'confident' in themselves we will > do so... > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Allen Mulvey wrote: > >> If you actually watched it before commenting, you would know that he did= , >> in >> fact, use a Rubidium counter. >> >> Allen >> >>> configurations and not measuring "gravity" at all. I think that mr >> eevblog >>> should have mentioned the need to use at least a Rubidium clock as >> counter >>> reference when doing what he did. He must have started some new movemen= t >>> among the masses with that blog (which I did not watch). All clocks and >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .