On 1 August 2014 15:40, John Gardner <goflo3@gmail.com> wrote:

> ...So I am getting more confused.....
>
> History suggests there's no point in getting worked up about
> the scheme until there's some concrete demonstration of the
> phenomena that doesn
> '
> t involve David Copperfield.
>

As regards the to-be-released-next-month [tm] battery charger, David
Copperfield is forever above the class of this act.

As regards the rest-mass less thruster - does NASA verification count as
"David Copperfield"?


                 Russell
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.