Pleased that you can recognize irony. That is a rare talent among forumists :-) My real point is that the whole concept of a "war crime" is meaningless. Once a nation embarks on a war ot os onevitable that atrocities will occur. And to try to categorise them is futile. Is bombing civilian populations worse than beating captured soldiers to dreath? On 8 July 2014 14:00, Martin K wrote: > On 7/8/2014 5:11 AM, David C Brown wrote: > > Curious how there were no war criminals on the winning side. Just goe= s > to > > prove that God is, indeed, on the side of the righteous > > > > Of course there were (I know you're being ironic.) > Are you referring to small groups or single soldiers or are you > referring to state-sanctioned atrocities committed by the allies? > Because I'd be interested to fill in the gaps in my knowledge of the > latter. > > - > Martin > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 __________________________________________ David C Brown 43 Bings Road Whaley Bridge High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .