On 9 May 2014 12:56, William "Chops" Westfield <westfw@mac.com> wrote:

> won't be converting to IPv6 "easily." (And you SHOULD be thinking about
> that at this point!))
>


I was going to say

"Seems like a lot of overhead particularly in apps when you only need udp a
few bytes.

I still dont quite get the need for IPv6.  It seemed it was an
over-reaction (by defence??? which i was told only has a handful of
separate networks now anyway).  NAT, double NAT, CIDR seem to have resolved
the issue"

However, the size and cost of embedded technology has shrunk and the
benefits of IPv6 now outweigh.

Justin
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.