Josh Koffman wrote:
>=20
> Thank you all for the replies! That's what I thought, so thank you for
> verifying what I was guessing. I think the book (published last year)
> just hasn't been able to keep up with the current rapid development of
> both MPLABX and XC8.

I sympathise with the author - it's been challenging to keep my tutorials
reasonably up to date.  But I note that even before I revised all my C
lessons to work with XC8 instead of HI-TECH C, that HI-TECH C had an
equivalent "#include <htc.h>" that included the appropriate processor heade=
r
in the same way.
So even a few years ago, if using HTC (which morphed into XC8), there was n=
o
need to specifically reference processor headers.

Regards,
David
www.gooligum.com.au



--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.