Jean-Paul and et al, Fluke has every right to protect their property. My personal and=20 professional opinion. Thanks, rich! On 3/25/2014 4:23 PM, Jean-Paul Louis wrote: > I did the same. > Let's all of us tell Fluke that such a predatory behavior will make them = loose customers. > > Jean-Paul (AC9GH) > > On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Chris McSweeny wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, RussellMc wrote: >> >>> The next step might be a post on Fluke's Facebook page along the lines = of >>> the one that I posted & copied to this thread. >>> If enough people advise what they think about bully-boy tactics on Fluk= e's >>> part, even when Fluke are (notionally anyway) within their rights to ac= t as >>> they have done, then it may actually do some good. [Actually: by >>> definition, if enough people comment then it WILL do some good, as that= is >>> what "enough" means in this context :-) ]. >>> >> I've already posted (some of) my thoughts there - I hope that was along = the >> right sort of lines. >> >> Chris >> --=20 >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .