On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Harold Hallikainen wrote: > I moved to the 24H as soon as it became available. I then moved to the > PIC32 as soon as it became available. I did just do one project using the > PIC24H because it has more ADC inputs than were available on the PIC24H. > The price differences between the chips is small enough that I generally > go for the fastest biggest chip I can. On some larger volume low cost > products, I move back to the PIC18, generally the QFN 64MHz parts. > Summarizing, if you're looking at moving away from PIC18, how about > PIC32MX? I have to start looking at PIC32MZ. I've considered it. I think I stand a better chance at the 24F series. Better compiler support, but the chips are still available in smaller packages with 5V options. > I tried migrating one project to MPLABX and gave up after a week. I'll tr= y > again later. On debugging with optimization, single stepping the code, it > just seems to jump all over the place. It's extremely difficult to figure > out what's going on. So, I debug with optimization disabled. Not a problem if the version of the compiler I use doesn't have any optimization! :) Josh --=20 A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .