Jim: I originally was going to use a DC-to- DC converter to charge the start battery, but that struck me as over-kill. Actually, the way I use the boat (we live aboard it all summer), the engine doesn't get used too much. I use a 185 watt solar panel to charge the house batteries, and can also charge the start from them if I chose. If we are in a marina, I can use the battery charger to take care of both batteries. But occasionally we do travel under power for a few hours, and that's when I'd like to have the start battery charged from the alternator. I've got a few ideas from this group on how to proceed. --=20 Larry Bradley =20 Orleans (Ottawa) Canada=20 On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 18:16 +0000, Jim Higgins KB3PU wrote: > Hi Bob, >=20 > Stepping outside my 35 years of experience with lead-acid batteries from = this=20 > point onward... >=20 > In the sailboat situation, it seems to me that if the very long leads to = the=20 > aux battery cause such a loss of voltage that recharge must be unduly=20 > extended, or source voltage raised at the expense of another battery=20 > connected closer to the charging source, the better solution is isolation= of=20 > the two batteries from each other during charging... something that will = need=20 > to be done with pulse charging anyhow.... or separate charging systems - = two=20 > alternators. >=20 > The OPs idea of an "old timey" on-off regulator on the nearby battery whi= le=20 > (I assume) the farther battery remains directly connected to the alternat= or,=20 > seems like a reasonable solution. Or maybe a second alternator for the a= ux=20 > battery if one can be installed. >=20 > JimH >=20 >=20 > Received from Bob Blick at 02/08/2014 04:54 UTC: >=20 > >Hi Jim, > > > >Does this apply to SLA and AGM as well as flooded lead acid? > > > >Friendly regards, Bob > > > >On Fri, Feb 7, 2014, at 07:48 PM, Jim Higgins KB3PU wrote: > > > > > I will say that my comments re: Pulse Charging come from 35 years as = a > > > Process Engineer in the lead-acid battery industry where I wrote mate= rial > > > specs and designed processes for battery manufacturing as well as had > > > plenty of hands-on experience. The same company also manufactured=20 > > chargers and > > > UPS systems. And its research labs did extensive investigation into = pulse > > > charging. The short story is that it has no advantage over constant > > > potential or modified constant potential charging and it has several > > > disadvantage in terms of greatly increased IR and I^2R losses as well= as > > > possible detrimental effects on the battery depending on the nature o= f > > > the > > > battery system and its load. The latter probably isn't a factor in t= his > > > case, but it is very much a factor in UPS systems. >=20 >=20 --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .