On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 14:05 -0700, Denny Esterline wrote:
> BTW, these are security devices... trying to circumvent it not recommende=
d
> or supported by this list.

Yikes, overreaction much? Simply wanting to know what a chip is doesn't
necessarily mean somebody is trying to break into Fort Knox.

In addition: do you presume to speak for EVERY SINGLE PERSON on this
list? FWIW, "trying to circumvent" is something I think MANY are
interested in, for the simple reason to truly understand how secure
something is.=20

If you immediately were to shut down every single person interested in
the least in a "security product" we'd be in a REALLY sorry state.
Research into security items has exposed glaring holes and gaps in
design, resulting in more secure products.

I'm a little touchy on this sort of thing because there is a dangerous
drive on many forums and lists I read to shut down ANYTHING that could
lead to "circumventing" security, and I don't believe that is a good
thing.

TTYL

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.