Hi. There are no 1-to-1 match between them, but the 16F882 seems to be a normal 28-pin device. There are *a lot* of enhanced 28-pin versions and only you can say which one of them matches your needs best. On the other hand, maybe you should not change device if you do not actualy has a problem with the stack depth. On yet another hand, there are a lot of *other* nice "enhancements" in the enhanced midrange range... :-) Jan-Erik. David C Brown wrote 2014-01-08 15:32: > I am designing around the 16F882. Is there an enhanced version of that? > > > On 8 January 2014 14:05, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> All "enhanced mid-range" has 16 levels. >> And you want probably these in any new design anyway. >> Doesn't help keeping track, but give more headroom... :-) >> >> Jan-Erik. >> >> >> David C Brown wrote 2014-01-08 14:48: >>> The return stack on the mid range PICs is limited to 8 levels. Whilst >> this >>> is generally adequate it is difficult to keep track of the call depth. >> Is >>> there any tool for examining a program for maximum call depth? >>> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > > > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .