> Thank you for a description of a combination locking mechanism that drive= s > an electrically conductive member into contact with another electrically > conductive surface to complete a circuit. The failure of any part of this > assembly is designed with utmost care and thought to prevent those two > conductive members from making contact and completing the circuit. Howeve= r, > in the event of a catastrophic event occurring, explosion, severe > deformation or fragmentation of entire assembly, evaporation and ionizati= on > of said assembly there is always a possibility, however remote, that a > conductive pathway may be made. Testing carried out in laboratory and fie= ld > of as many failure modes as possible still does not rule out the one chai= n > of events that would cause the safety device to fail safe. How many times > have I heard the phrase. 'One in a million chance of failure' to be utter= ed > after something went wrong. Having done a little risk assessment in the > past, I have come to realize how we can come to believe that we have > covered all eventualities only to be reminded of our shortcomings when it > does not work out that way. I encourage you to look up the inquiry into t= he > Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in the North sea back in the 1980's (?) > At that time, the most safety designed platform built. Killed a lot of > people, most of them died as aresult of multiple failures of the safety > systems. >=20 I use to say - If something can happen, how small the possibility ever is, = it=20 will. Just give it enough time. If humans are involved in the possibility=20 equation, the possibility is increased substantially. This is also why I am against nuclear power plants (I used to be pro, in my= =20 youth). Just look at Harrisburg, Tjernobyl and Fukushima. And when we talk= =20 about storing the waste, the time is really long... However, the tricky part is to determine how small possibility of failure i= s=20 acceptable. Because there will almost always be a possibility of failure. I= =20 still go outside even though I can get hit by a meteor, I accept this risk.= I=20 also drive my car quite often, even though there are humans involved (both= =20 myself and others), perhaps I shouldn't... /Ruben =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Ruben J=F6nsson AB Liros Electronic Box 9124 200 39 Malm=F6 Sweden www.liros.se Tel +46 40142078 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .