I do not have experience with it but what about: https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page Real-Time Linux? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:15 PM, veegee wrote: > I've stopped following the QNX scene ever since those greedy suits over a= t > Blackberry decided to buy it and make it completely closed source(?) or > otherwise inaccessible to a hobbyist such as myself. Now that Blackberry = is > going down the toilet, what does this mean for QNX? Any predictions? > > Many years ago, I remember being able to download a full QNX 6 developmen= t > kit on a hobbyist licence and compiling custom ROMs for my single board > computers. They gave you everything in that package, including the abilit= y > to add/remove parts of the kernel and I believe the kernel source was > provided as well. I could get the ROM down to a few megabytes including a > full network stack on the POSIX compliant OS, running on a 20-year old 38= 6 > very nicely. > > After Blackberry shut out the hobbyist community, there was a void that > Neutrino had once fulfilled. I would really like to see a POSIX compliant= , > real time micro kernel again. Hopefully QNX, but I wouldn't mind using > another. > > Is anyone aware if such a thing exists these days? Linux is wonderful, bu= t > it's neither real time nor a micro kernel. GNU Hurd is... well... Hurd - > underdeveloped. FreeRTOS doesn't even count. > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .