I started the "don't be evil" digression. What I saw posted in response seemed legitimate enough./ and more interesting than anything I should look at when there is a job to finish :-). But, please avoid an intensive pursuit of that theme here if possible as it's the sort of topic that can lead to an escalation of 'knocking' . Even if I started it :-) Russell On 20 July 2013 07:56, Fabilous Muller wrote: > In article > , > apptechnz@gmail.com says... > > > > Googletalk and the rest are social network wannabees. > > One of Google's starting stated aims was "don't be evil" but in a world > > where most other organisations are evil by default, that's a bit of an > > ask, and Google has been trying to redefine the meaning of "evil" ever > > since. > > > > yeap , redefining evil : > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/google-pharma-whitaker- > sting/all/ > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .