Right, maybe we are already batteries, we just have not woke up yet :-) Btw: Why would they use humans for batteries when they could use a much primitive live form for that, a bacteria: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21925123 Or maybe a fish maybe even better: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/10/22/2398277.htm Tamas On 3 July 2013 23:28, Peter Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tamas Rudnai > wrote: > > > Sounds really interesting! > > What could possibly go wrong? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbEHoU0lWyx8 > > -p. > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D"int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D%s%s%s, q=3D%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=3D%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }", q=3D"\"",s,q,q,a=3D"\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); } --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .