> But, still the issue persists that the increments are in the order of 4, =
decrements
> too..

I haven't worked through the code, but the coder could be using every edge =
as a count, thereby getting a 4x resolution, but only updating the counter =
on a certain edge.

Does this make sense to how you work through the code?
--=20
Scanned by iCritical.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.