Hat: admin thinking cap.

Please do not discuss  the original post on this thread  on-list.
I consider the original post probably doesn't meet list guidelines
*BUT* does a service to list members who are interested (as I am), and
may not do too much harm as long as it does not result in a wave of
follow on "here are links to my just cause", of which there are a very
vast number (both just causes & links to them). .

It's possible admins may comment further on this, one way or t'other,
but maybe not.

___

Tamas' follow on comment was completely outside list guidelines. (Sorry Tam=
as).


Removes hat.
___________________

Personal comment only:
Carries no official weight:

I personally find this subject of interest and the page linked to is
an extremely informative one.

However, the subject as a whole is "political" and seems to me to fall
outside list guidelines.
The issue is not whether any of the groups involved  is right or felt
to be in the right but that subjects of this sort have been
specifically excluded from the list both because there are many places
where discussion is welcome and because it  has proven impossible time
after time after time, in this forum and 98.696 % of all others, to
hold reasoned, intelligent polite discussions for more than about
2.71828 ... iterations before flaming mayhem abuse and general
hilarity ensue. And then you wake Bob up, and we're off.

So, best avoided.

Post the special interest links to OT if the cause seems good enough
if you must. Realise you may get in trouble for doing so. A comment
that discussion is not in order may be in order.

Please do not use this as a new way to annoy people, admins (who are
usually people as well), or show how smart you are. You know who you
are :-). (Did I say that?).


   Russell

_______________

This is why we don't do this here:

My slightly edited version of a follow on post. I'm happy to discuss it off=
 list

On 8 June 2013 08:44, Just some guy y'know wrote: ~~~~~~=3D

> That is quite something! I wish people in some-place were that brave! May=
be we
> need the Prior-group-of-thugs  back in some-place  to get rid of our este=
emed-ruler .

As the-man who Godwin alludes to probably didn't really say:

             "Who now remembers some-related-place?"


      R
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.