Lyle Hazelwood wrote:
> > > Line 8. Should be i++ not ++i
> >
> > This is a pre-increment rather than post-increment, so you start
> > with 1 rather than 0. Not wrong. If you wanted to use i++ you'd
> > have to start with i =3D 1.
>=20
> If I understand correctly, that would only be the case if the ++i or
> i++ was used in a compound statement. In this case there is no
> difference between the two at all.

A lot of us got into the habit of writing ++i "by default" (i.e., unless we
really needed i++ in an expression), because many simple-minded small-syste=
m
C compilers generate more efficient code for ++i than for i++, even if the
result isn't being used.

-- Dave Tweed
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.