Thanks Herbert! RAW means it keeps all bits of each color components? So it is not converted to 8x8x8 bit of RGB, right? And I guess that is also not compressing to lossy JPG where slightly different colors are washed together, so when you change the contrast, color or white balance on the post processing areas will not ended up in blocks, but kept in smooth gradients, right? I guess RAW format saves to ridiculously large files? Tamas On 13 May 2013 08:24, Herbert Graf wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 11:49 -0700, Tamas Rudnai wrote: > > Watching some youtube reviews they say T4i (predecessor or T5i) has > better > > auto white balance and contrast than Nikon D3200. My friend just showed > his > > T3i and that one has a dynamic white balance adjustment -- where we can > > alter the auto level (so we can always add +1.2 for example to whatever > the > > automatic would choose, so we can compensate it if we think it was > wrong). > > Is there anything like that on Nikon? > > FWIW one of the BEST things you can do to improve your photography is > shoot in RAW. Shooting in RAW gives you SO much more flexibility in post > to improve your shot, the difference is night and day. > > Why I mention this is because when you shoot in RAW white balance > doesn't matter anymore. You set WB in post when shooting RAW, so what > you set in the camera doesn't matter anymore. > > Even without shooting RAW, I recommend you get comfortable setting WB > manually. You will be much happier with the results. > > TTYL > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D"int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D%s%s%s, q=3D%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=3D%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }", q=3D"\"",s,q,q,a=3D"\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); } --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .