Barry Gershenfeld wrote:
> Been there, done that, and be glad that at least the macro for the reserv=
ed
> addresses actually was setting a bit that had to do with the reserved
> addresses!  And thanks for the warning on that one, since I haven't seen =
it
> yet.
>
> What I do is to make it equivalent to another macro of my own, such as
> #define I2C_IGNORE_RESERVED_ADDRESSES  that I can use in my code so that =
it
> looks and acts proper.
I'm personally of the opinion that on pics it's probablly less hassle to=20
hit the hardware
directly than to deal with microchip's buggy libraries. I guess if you=20
regulally port
between different families you might think differently though.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.