By just giving different nets the same name, they will connect together=20
(not directly shown on the schematic, but it will appear on the board=20
layout).  However, I find something odd about this -- I think it keeps=20
making me think I've forgotten to connect these lines.  So instead, I=20
create a bunch of supply signals in a library of my own, for signals I=20
use frequently and that get routed to multiple points around the schematic.

Cheers,
-Neil.


On 3/21/2013 6:19 AM, Josh Koffman wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What do you use when you're working on a large schematic in Eagle, and
> it's not practical to draw all the nets connecting your bits? I'm
> trying to figure out the best way to create those arrows that you
> often see indicating a connection to another part of the drawing. You
> see them a lot in multi page schematics.
>
> So far the best I've found is in the Supply2 library, parts V--> and
> V<-- . They are a nice shape, but that's all they are. They don't
> actually connect to a net, so while you can edit the value to display
> whatever you want in the arrow, that will have no bearing on the net
> that you place it near, meaning the two parts of your drawing might
> not actually connect.
>
> I feel like there must be a way to do this that's less inherently
> risky than just manually keeping track of ensuring the net names
> match, but I haven't found it.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Josh

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.