As far as I remember. John Deere uses NMEA2000 CANbus only. Rodolfo ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Richard Prosser" To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:38 PM Subject: Re: [EE] GPS, CAN & NMEA2000 > Hi Isac, > > Are you sure that the format is Nemea? Many manufacturers put out Nemea= =20 > as > an option but have an in-house binary format for their specialist > application. I work for Trimble and we have TSIP for binary, high > precision output and Nemea is available (sometimes as an addional=20 > purchase) > for external use. The TSIP output is required for cm accuracy. There is > information available on some of the binary formats used - others are mor= e > restricted. Who is the manufacturer of the GPS gear? > > Richard > > > > On 4 March 2013 08:58, Nily wrote: > >> or this one: >> http://www.can-cia.org/index.php?id=3D496 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Isaac Marino Bavaresco" >> To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." >> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 9:34 AM >> Subject: RE: [EE] GPS, CAN & NMEA2000 >> >> >> > Em 3/3/2013 13:59, alan.b.pearce@stfc.ac.uk escreveu: >> >>> Maybe this will help you >> >>> http://www.adfweb.com/home/products/CAN_BUS_analyzers.asp >> >>> >> >>>> Does someone know anything about NMEA 2000, and more specifically >> >>>> NMEA 2000 over CAN BUS? >> >> Although that analyser talks about NMEA2000, it isn't clear to me tha= t >> it >> >> actually decodes the messages into human readable format, it may only >> >> handle the burst mode decode noted in the Wikipedia article I posted. >> > >> > I have already logged a lot of data from the bus with my Saleae Logic= =20 >> > and >> > an ATSAM3X-EK. I can see patterns in the data and probably may even >> > understand it with time, but I need something more trustable and fast. >> > >> > >> >> It strikes me that Isaac will have to buy the NMEA standard, and I=20 >> >> would >> >> have thought the cost of such standards would be billable against the >> >> customer anyway. >> > >> > >> > Yes, I already bought one of the documents from the standard, but it >> > doesn't help and not even gives a hint where to find the important >> > parts. Buying the entire set of documents is out of question, it would >> > cost several thousand dollars and would include too much information I >> > don't need. >> > >> > My client probably will desist of the project if he must buy the entir= e >> > set of documents. >> > >> > I would be glad to buy one or two more documents of the standard, only= =20 >> > I >> > would like to know what parts document the structure of the packets, >> > data types and what packets represent what information. >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Isaac >> > >> > -- >> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> > View/change your membership options at >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > --=20 > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >=20 --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .