Nearly bought this, (for on site servicing) but opted for a Bitscope Pocket Analyser instead. One has to have an ultra portable 10.1 inch netbook to run the applications (DSO, Logic/Protocol Analyser and more) but vastly superior and more versatile with firmware updates and technical support. On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Bob Blick wrote: > Hi Nicola, > > Wow, lots of discussion about it at SeeedStudio. Good to know, thanks! > > Cheerful regards, > > Bob > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013, at 03:51 PM, Nicola Perotto wrote: > > Hi Bob & all, > > > > On 08/02/2013 21:51, Bob Blick wrote: > > > Hi Y'all, > > > > > > Does anyone here own one of these DSO203 oscilloscopes? I'd like to > have > > > something ultraportable that isn't too valuable. > > I own one. I'm not satisfied. Only in the last months was available a > > decent > > firmware, from other user the producer haven't done nothing more that a > > first > > buggy release! > > > > Here the forum (good): > > http://www.seeedstudio.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=3D26 > > > > > > > > http://www.ebay.com/itm/160705670184 > > > > > > Seems to be this year's "nano" oscilloscope. Specs look pretty nice, > > > 72MSa/sec, 20mV, and it's got two channels. > > Bandwith a lot lower... see the forum for details. > > > > > I expect the firmware is marginal. > > This sound strange to me! > > > > > Good triggering has been what I've always noticed to be a problem wit= h > > > cheap scopes. > > Now seems to works enough. In the past was very bad. > > Also the calibration was terrible. > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 Perry Curling-Hope Research and Development --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .