Peter wrote 2012-12-14 23:17:
> And yes, searching more yielded the PIC solution(s). Here is one (2011):
> http://www.g4jnt.com/PIC_DDS.pdf
>

That used a 16F628. I'm sure a much better result could
be get using one of the new 16F1xxx models using the
improved index adressing. The 256 table in use could
be copied from flash to GPR for better performance,
reading from flash need an extra NOP efter the read.

Jan-Erik.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.