Not sure that I've ever wanted a const pointer other than "int p[2];"

What would you use it for?=20

-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of
V G
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 20:04
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
Subject: Re: [OT] C/C++ pointer syntax

Another case. What if you want to declare a const pointer like so: int *
const p;?

int *const p; looks weird, and it's illogical. How would you even go about
trying to justify why the asterisk is touching the const keyword?

int* const p; looks better.

int * const p; looks the best
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membershi=
p
options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist


--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.