On Oct 4, 2012, at 4:56 AM, peter green wrote:

> Lets take a look at the C18 libraries documentation.

>> A bitmask that is created by performing a bitwise AND operation (=91&=92=
) with a value from each of the categories listed below. These values are d=
efined in the file adc.h.

Bitwise AND??!!  Really?
Is there some inherent advantage of inverted bitmasks that I'm missing?  It=
 seems very counter-intuitive if the registers themselves don't have active=
-low individual bits (like some fuse/config bytes.)

BillW


--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.