Hi, I look at it the same way, I am not sure that is the way to look at it but it works for me. But interestingly, like someone as pointed out when casting you will often see (int*). Best Regards Luis On Sep 29, 2012 7:25 PM, "Harold Hallikainen" wrote: > > > Semeantically I've always treated int *c as > > ' *c is an int, so c has the address of an int' > > > > BAJ > > > I like the logic of that explanation! > > Harold > > > -- > FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com - Advertising > opportunities available! > Not sent from an iPhone. > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .