On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:46:37 -0700
Tamas Rudnai <tamas.rudnai@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems it is very very very low priority as in 2012 it is still there..=
..

I hope low priority interrupts in their processors don't get the same
treatment... 9 years latency is too much for me ;-)

Cheers,
John
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.