On 6 July 2012 08:26, RussellMc <apptechnz@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is no reason to think that everything must be accessible and
> explicable.
> There is every reason to expect that this is not the case.
>
> Understanding and knowledge are separate things.
> Both can however be inaccessible, individually or together.
>

However, we expect something out of it implicit or explicit, right?
Otherwise why would we spend billions on such a research?

Tamas



>
>
>      R
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



--=20
int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D"int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
printf(s=3D%s%s%s, q=3D%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=3D%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
q=3D"\"",s,q,q,a=3D"\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.