At 15.39 2012.06.12, you wrote: >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Electron wrote: > >> At 21.52 2012.06.11, you wrote: >> >I'm glad you survived. >> >> It looked like it was insulated. :D >> >> Famous last words... :~{ I went back there.. after A LOT of km's, I found the wire repaired (i.e. ba= ck up). Yes it was a RF cable probably. Anyhow, no sign of malfunction from that distance. Km's useful anyway to test even more the system.. but.. argh, I could have = tested it near my home then. :( I tried then to replicate the problem in the lab placing two working (calli= ng each other) GSM phones upon the ECU, but they caused no problem. Well I've collected 20 hours and 700km's of tests on a prototype with doubt= ful solderings, I guess I can affirm the design is reliable now anyway. :D Cheers, Mario --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .