For me, the only drawback I found is in adc library (for dspic 30F4011). It seems to be configured at slowest speed and has not options to change it (CCS has). I needed to made conversions at maximum speed, so I ended up working with registers directly. For the rest it is fine for me ( hobby use), I prefer mikroC more than CCS, wich, I think, is it's direct competitor. El s=E1bado 28 de abril de 2012, John Ferrell escribi=F3: > I have been a miKro Pascal user for about 10 years. Buy once, updates > for life. Continuous enhancements & new chip support. Forums are active > & supported. The new USB dongle allows easy portability. You can use all > of the compilers for free with a limit of 2k code generation. They try > to keep their customers happy. All compilers for micro's that I am > familiar with have data structures. No "with", "Record", "variant", etc. > > As far as code size generated, efficiency, etc, I don't know. > > Schematics for hardware, manuals, etc are available online. > > > On 4/28/2012 1:58 AM, Chetan Bhargava wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I understand that it has been discussed before and I don't intend to >> start a compiler war. I just would like to invite comments on MicroC >> compiler from mikroe.com. I believe that it comes with a pretty good >> library. >> >> Any comments would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks. > > -- > John Ferrell W8CCW > =93During times of universal deceit, > Telling the TRUTH becomes a revolutionary act=94 > George Orwell > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .