> Correct. So it can be used in my macro. In fact it may be a good idea.
> Using BANKSEL would backport my macro back to the older family of chips
> too because BANKSEL will properly twiddle the appropriate bits, whereas
> mine specifically does a MOVLB, which is an enhanced 16F only
> instruction.
> Personally I'm not pressed because I'm never planning on moving back to
> the older chips ever. With enhanced chips in every package size, I
> cannot see a good reason to every move back.

The other thing to note about Olins macros is that they only generate instr=
uctions for the bits in the bank selection register that require changing, =
where BANKSEL always generates instructions to change all the bits. Olins m=
acros will even generate no code if no bits require changing, so splashing =
the macro around before every instruction that could access a register in a=
 bank doesn't mean you fill up the code space.
--=20
Scanned by iCritical.

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.