Reading is actually fundamental. That's what I get for reading the reply
and not the original post.

BAJ

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:53:25PM +0200, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> > Why not do software PWM on the existing I/O pin then? All that is neede=
d is
> > a low pass filter.
>=20
> Quote Neil: FWIW, there's too much going on in the chip
> to get any decent bit-banged PWM.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> Wouter van Ooijen
>=20
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
> C++ on uC blog: http://www.voti.nl/erblog
>=20
> --=20
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
Byron A. Jeff
Department Chair: IT/CS/CNET
College of Information and Mathematical Sciences
Clayton State University
http://cims.clayton.edu/bjeff
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.