Bonus points, when you convert back to polar, the length vector is proporti=
onal to bearing quality. =20

Mark Rages <markrages@gmail.com> wrote:

>Suppose I have some measurements of an angle as integer degrees in the
>range [0, 359].
>
>I would like to find an average of these measurements as an estimate
>of the true angle.
>
>A simple numerical average doesn't work:  Suppose the measurements are
>0, 1, 359.  Then a simple average is 120, but the number I'm looking
>for is zero.
>
>Is there a standard algorithm to do what I want?
>
>Regards,
>Mark
>markrages@gmail
>--=20
>http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>View/change your membership options at
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.